MEd.
Program Standard 1
Teacher leaders will:
model ethical and moral behavior.
Relevant Courses in Program:
EDU6085 Moral Issues in Education
Reflections
Original Experience
Teacher leaders will:
model ethical and moral behavior.
Relevant Courses in Program:
EDU6085 Moral Issues in Education
Reflections
Original Experience
Prior
to this program, I
understood the wonderful privilege we had of modeling strong ethical .. and
moral behavior for my students. I have always considered honoring culture and
cultivating student personal sense of identity a high classroom priority. I
have also always been committed to promoting compassion and acceptance in
school, and shedding a light on injustices to create aware, empathetic
students. Prior to this course, I recognized that our classrooms were charged,
and composed of students of diverse backgrounds, and beliefs however, I was
reluctant to ever discuss topics that could be controversial, mostly because I
never wanted any student to feel uncomfortable, or marginalized. After this
course, I am now well-aware that it is not only critical to know about your
students’ culture, but also to discuss authentic, real-world issues, and to
model to students, and colleagues the importance of having difficult conversations
with peers, and learning how to disagree respectfully.
New Learning
New Learning
Judith Pace refers to a “charged classroom.” The
charged classroom that exists in our nation refers to the intrinsic tensions in
our classrooms today. There is not a solitary cause for these tensions, rather
there are a multitude of complex contributors. Among these contributors are
different viewpoints, conflicts and the handling of conflicts, contemporary, curricular
demands and constraints on teachers, maintaining high expectations, while
encouraging authentic engagement, diversity and pressure to close the
achievement gap, while employing teaching techniques that engage all students.
Any educator who has spent a day in a contemporary public classroom is well
aware of the convoluted, difficult, highly complex, seemingly impossible nature
of our profession. This book eloquently points out that many aspects of the
charged classroom are also, in nature rather contradictory. For example, we are
expected to cultivate student’s unique identities (p. 5) and to engage and
excite students, while maintaining order and high expectations for student
behavior. We are told to teach students how to think, and to express themselves
appropriately and constructively, yet, are often encouraged to avoid conflict.
Classrooms are incredibly complicated and riddled with tension, yet we are
increasingly pressured to close the achievement gap, to improve test scores,
and to cover all curricular materials in a timely manner. The term “charged
classroom” sheds light on the intricate, countless, classroom tensions present
that educators and students must navigate, and their implications on the
educational system, and students.
Throughout my research in this program, I was
truly stunned by how much research elucidates the importance of social, and
values education. A huge theme throughout my research was reframing the goals
of public education to include, and emphasize teaching values. While academic
learning will always be at the forefront of our efforts, social, emotional and
“ethical competencies” must also be explicitly taught. (Cohen, 2006). Another theme in my research was simply the
inconsistent nature of implementing ethic learning, and guidelines for
social-emotional learning in our nation, as the adoption of such programs are
at the state level, and not always long-term. The most powerful component of my
research came up in two different sources in which the authors equate ignoring
the teaching of social, emotional, and ethical education to social injustice,
because this type of education is a human right which all students are entitled
to (Cohen, 2006; Beland, 2003).
Another theme that surfaced throughout my
research was that our society and students are changing, and, as a result, it
is increasingly important to equip our students with the necessary tools to
interact positively with one another, and handle difficult situations, and
emotions. In Wanted: Compassion, Goodwin asserts that our children are less
empathetic than they have been historically. Goodwin asserts that our society
is generally impolite, and that this can be attributed to a general lack of
consideration for the feelings of others. He believes that we can only amend
this lack of empathy through education, and teaching specific strategies in our
classrooms to teach compassion to our students. His
solution involves explicitly teaching compassion to our students and children,
and provides steps for educators to teach students how to be compassionate.
Through strengthening perspective talking, helping kids practice caring,
and measuring and valuing compassion in the classroom, Goodwin asserts that we
will cultivate more compassionate, and caring students. Every article, and
study that I encountered had one thing in common. They all expressed a need for
increased social emotional education in our public schools. Hanson et. Al (2012) explained the impacts of
the Lessons in Character program, which is an ELA curriculum that integrates a
character education program on student academic achievement, social competence,
problem behaviors, and the school environment. This article explained that
social emotional curriculums do not necessarily need to stand alone, or be
separate. They can easily be integrated in core content areas, and through
daily instruction
Perhaps the most difficult balance to achieve
in the classroom, is the balance of maintaining high expectations while authentically
engaging student, and eliciting student response while maintaining a sense of
order. This also must be maintained while navigating the intense pressure to
meet the curricular demands, and focus on closing the achievement gap, and
increasing test scores. In order to deeply engage students, the content
presented must be of high interest, and relate to students in a meaningful way.
Often times, curriculum and content standards do not allow for teachers to
create highly engaging lessons as they are focused on teaching to specific
standards. This leaves very little room for individualized, interesting lessons
that cultivate strong academic identities. Students benefit from a strong,
multi-cultural curriculum that fosters a development of their identities, and
provides authentic, democratic learning opportunities. Now more than ever,
students need to understand how to respectfully disagree, and discuss modern
issues in a way that leads to a deeper understanding of differing perspectives.
Fostering these dispositions through content is not present in many
curriculums, so this becomes a daunting task for teachers to undertake.
Scholars
deem it vital to openly discuss political and controversial topics in the
classroom as it promotes “political equality” and teaches students to
productively address conflict, which is an imperative social, and societal
skill (p.45). Students need to be taught how to be active democratic members of
society, however often in the classrooms teachers avoid teaching, or discussing
controversial topics for a multitude of reasons. The outcomes of these
discussions can be unknown or messy, these discussions can be difficult to
manage, and can lead to potential conflict between students and families. I
have also found that we are encouraged to avoid potentially provocative or
charged topics with our students, and told that such topics should be discussed
at home to avoid upsetting families. From my experience, it is also implied
that we have far too many standards to meet to justify straying from the
curriculum. The current state of politics in our nation illustrates more than
ever that many adults lack the ability to have constructive political
discussions, and to disagree in a productive respectful manner. I believe that
this demonstrates a lack of democratic education and the importance of teaching
this skills in our classrooms. Students at any age have meaningful, important
opinions, and views on controversial topics. It is critical to make room for
provocative discussions in the classroom. Our public-school classrooms are
becoming increasingly charged, however students can be taught to handle this
appropriately and constructively through honest, open discussions through which
disagreements are promoted, and handled respectfully
Impact
My research has allowed me a deeper
understanding of the importance of teaching social-emotional skills in our
public-school classrooms. Every source that I found, along with my own,
informal research that I conducted at my school elucidates the critical
importance of teaching students to express and manage their emotions, along
with the importance of teaching students how to cultivate positive and
fulfilling relationships with others. Inarguably, there is a need to teach
social-emotional education to all students in public schools. It is essential
that this is done effectively, and that teachers are provided with materials to
meet student needs. For students to be successful adults, capable of
contributing positively to society, we must support their social-emotional
development and teach them how to appropriately express their feelings, manage
inevitable disappointment, and cultivate relationships with others. Neglecting
this critical component of educating our students could have harmful effects on
student behavior, and, eventually, our society. We need to create individuals
who can create mutually fulfilling friendships, who can appropriately express
and work through frustration, who can advocate for themselves when isolated,
and have genuine empathy and compassion for others. While some schools have
effective social-emotional programs or curriculums, many teaches do not feel as
though the materials provided are sufficient to effectively teach students
these skills.
Above all, this program has demonstrated the importance
of creating a classroom environment in which all students feel comfortable
expressing, and developing their identities.
Artifacts:
References
Beland,
K. (2003). Eleven principles sourcebook: How to achieve quality education in
P–
12 schools. Washington, DC: Character Education
Partnership.
Cohen,
Jonathan. (2006). Social, Emotional, Ethical, and Academic Education: Creating
a Climate for Learning, Participation in Democracy, and Well-Being.
Harvard
Educational Review, v76 n2 p201-237.
Goodwin, B. (2017). Wanted: Compassion:
When empathy wanes, the best response
might be to strengthen compassion. Educational
Leadership, 75 (3), 80-81.
Hanson, Thomas; Dietsch, Barbara; Zheng, Hong. (2012). Lessons in Character Impact
Evaluation
Pace, J. L. (2015). The Charged Classroom: Predicaments and Possibilities for Democratic Teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.
No comments:
Post a Comment