Currently, my third grade students
are taking on their first research project in which they have the freedom to
comment on one another’s work for the first time, and explore district-approved
websites. I decided to create a digital
citizenship lesson addressing general tablet responsibility, research
responsibility, and posting responsibility. I also saved this lesson to the
server, so that each student could follow along on his or her individual
devices. I split this lesson into three segments so that students are able to
practice each element of digital citizenship in conjunction with their
research. I taught one portion of this lesson each day in order, so that they
could practice each skill before moving on to the next. The first day was simply dedicated to
refreshing how to handle the tablets responsibly. My students have used these
tablets a handful of times this year, but I find that a general review before
each use is incredibly necessary. The next portion of this lesson focused on
research responsibility. In our district, the students are only allowed to use
district approved links which is wonderful in that it promotes web safety, but
can also be limiting in that it is not conducive to teaching students how to explore
and find their own relevant links safely. Lastly, my students had their first
opportunity to post on one another’s research projects through our district’s
server. I wanted to model and emphasize commenting positivity and safety so
this lesson spanned over the course of this entire project. Each day, I modeled
posting positive, constructive feedback appropriately and safely. I can report
without reservation that this was the most enjoyable aspect of the digital
safety lesson for my students. They absolutely flourished when giving clear,
specific and positive feedback to their peers. Each student was so excited to
share their comments, and explain the components of positive posting. I really
enjoyed creating this lesson, and love that it led to a successful digital
citizenship lesson.
Saturday, 10 December 2016
Sunday, 4 December 2016
Growth Through Accomplished Teaching
As I read through my
initial reflection it became strikingly evident to me that the skills I have
attained in this course have been, and will continue to be invaluable to my
practice. I read through the words of my initial reflection and though they
sounded familiar, I felt as if they were also distant. Since September, if I
have transformed so much as both a reflective teacher, and a leader. I have
always been an extremely passionate, reflective teacher with a strong desire to
grow which is reflected in my initial words, however, through my research,
understanding of the Marzano Framework, and collaborative opportunities through
this course, I now have the tools necessary to facilitate a productive,
data-driven and constructive professional learning community. I have attained a
more data driven approach to reflection and analysis of teaching and student
work. As a result of the past ten weeks, my reflective practices, the strength
of my lesson design, and the productivity of my PLC meetings have improved
greatly.
When I consider the teacher leadership standard
address in this course, “Engage in analysis of teaching and collaborative
practices” I feel as I presume my third graders feel when they use the work as
evidence to determine that they have reached their learning target for the day.
I can say, with absolute certainty that this course has guided me to meet
Teacher Leadership Standard 4. I will address my improvement when analyzing my
teaching individually, and collectively and reflecting to improve my practice. Prior
to this course and in my initial response, I described myself as “agonizingly
reflective.” This was true; I spent far too much energy replaying ever minute
of my lesson in my head, and overthinking every instructional decision that I
made. Now, I pour my energy into reflecting through a data-driven lens that
will allow me to improve educational outcomes for my students. This takes place
in both individual reflective practices, and as a PLC. Individually, I now
analyze my instruction, and my student lens with a focus on “improving
teaching, not proving that students got it” (Duel, 2009). It is vital to use student work to clarify
the specific components that students need support with in order to design
effective interventions. Data-driven reflection is an integral component of
impactful PLC work. As leader, it is essential that I cultivate a deeply
trusting, respectful environment. In order to attain a trusting environment, I
must be willing to take ownership of instructional mistakes, and model using
authentic, imperfect data to improve my practice, or “to honestly and thoroughly reveal
professional struggle” (Nicholson, Capitelli, Richert &
Bonetti, 2016). Ultimately, it is imperative to understand that impactful
teaching requires constant adjustment, and through a lens of imperfection and
growth. At the beginning of the course, I facilitated productive PLC meetings,
but the way in which we have approached data analysis has shifted immensely
after further exposure to best practice in this class. Prior to this class, we
would bring our data to meetings; identify students requiring interventions,
and plan appropriate interventions for those students. This course has driven me to fine-tune this
process to maximize our precious time together.
I was given the idea to frontload the majority of this process. I now
send our analysis questions in advance to ensure that my teammates come to the
meeting prepared to sharing.
Moving
forward, I will continue to lead PLC meetings in a manner that recognizes that
the most important component of PLC work is to use formative data to improve
student learning (Defour & Reeves, 2016). I
will not only continue to analyze data with my team to plan interventions for
struggling students, but will also work with my team to determine the
most impactful, appropriate interventions that
“employ systematic, intensive, focused, and immediate small-group instruction”
(Defour & Reeves, 2016). I will also
continue to recognize that the most crucial PLC work is only possible to
complete when a warm, mutually-respectful environment is created and
maintained.
Through my coaching sessions with my
colleagues, my research, and deeper analysis of the Marzano Framework, my
lesson design, planning techniques, and lesson delivery have positively
improved. In my initial reflection, I indicated that I delve deeply into the
Marzano framework solely during my observation time. With my growing understanding
and comfort with this framework, it has now become an extremely useful,
formative tool when designing lessons. For each criterion, there are examples
elucidating specifically what an unsatisfactory, basic, proficient, and a
distinguished rating would look like. This is a very beneficial tool in
improving teaching practices as these examples show precisely what steps I must
take in order to improve. For example, as illustrated in my lesson plan, in my
lesson planning session with my classmates, my goal was to strengthen accessing
my student’s prior knowledge, and building background knowledge. We used the
provided Accomplished Teaching Lesson Guide for Effective instruction to map
out how content-specific prior knowledge would be activated, and how I could
build background knowledge to ensure that all students have access to the
content, and to promote student engagement, and buy-in. We also discussed as a
group, the importance of using our student’s background knowledge and
experiences to strengthen their understanding of the content, and to promote
diversity. Jiang (2014) claims that by recognizing differences and “by being
open to diverse ideas, teacher[s] establish a safe classroom environment.”
(p.301). It was incredibly powerful to brainstorm ideas with other
professionals to choose the most impactful strategies. As a result of this
experience, my lesson design improved, and, ultimately, my students were successful.
In
the future, I will continue to use these resources to help inform and improve
my planning, and my instruction. Being that the Marzano Framework is incredibly
comprehensive, I will always have areas to focus upon to improve my practice,
and specific examples to support my improvement. As a teacher in UPSD, I have always adhered to
the UPSD basics of instruction, which align exceptionally well with the Marzano
framework, but I now recognize the power of collaboratively planning with peers
to gains ideas to strengthen my lessons. I will continue to utilize my
teammates’ perspectives to strength my practice, and to recognize each of them
as the invaluable resource that they are.
In
the past ten weeks, my collaborative practice, my reflective practice and my
lesson design have all improved. As a result, the educational experience my
students have been provided with has also improved. Ultimately, I have learned
that the most essential skill an accomplished teacher can develop is a strong
belief that we are never done learning, and to maintain that growth mindset
indefinitely. I look forward to continuing to apply all that I have learned and
to constantly refine my craft to become the best educator and PLC leader
possible.
References
Defour,
R., Reeves, D. (2016) The futility of PLC lite. Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.spu.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=c4fb9e6c-27e1-454d-b26c-17a9cee2499a%40sessionmgr102&vid=1&hid=124.
Deul,
A. Holmlund, M. Slavit. D., Kennedy, A. (2009).
Looking at Student Work.
Educational Leadership. Retrieved from http:ww.ascud.org/lookingatstudentwork
Jian,
Y. (2014). Exploring Teacher Questioning as a Formative Assessment Strategy.
RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching And Research, 45(3), 286-304.
Nicholson, J. Capitelli, A.,
Richert, A. & Bonetti, S. (2016) The
Affordances of Using a
Teacher Leadership Network to Support Leadership Development.
Teacher Leadership Network to Support Leadership Development.
York
Barr, J., Sommers, W.A., Ghere, G.S., & Montie, J. (2006). Reflective
Practice to Improve Schools:
An Action Guide for Educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
An Action Guide for Educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Artifacts
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)